Classet vs TenzoAI (2026): SMB Hiring Automation vs Enterprise Structured Voice Screening

Buyers often put Classet and TenzoAI on the same shortlist because both aim to reduce the time and cost of early funnel screening. In practice, they tend to win for very different reasons.

• Classet is commonly evaluated by SMBs and smaller staffing teams that want a faster way to engage candidates, move them to the right next step, and reduce coordinator workload without a heavy implementation.
• TenzoAI is typically selected by enterprises and large staffing agencies that need structured voice screens, transparent rubric scoring, and audit ready artifacts that can stand up to governance reviews across teams, regions, and clients.

---

Choose Classet if

• You are an SMB or a smaller agency that needs faster candidate engagement and basic screening at a practical price point
• Your workflow is relatively standardized and you can live with lighter integrations
• You prefer quick deployment over deep process design
• You want a tool that helps recruiters do more with less, even if your governance requirements are light

Choose Tenzo AI if

• You are an enterprise, large staffing agency, or RPO that needs consistent evaluation and defensible decisions
• You want structured voice screening with rubric based scoring that produces reviewer friendly artifacts
• You operate in compliance sensitive environments and care about audit readiness
• You want advanced controls like de-biasing, fraud detection, identity verification, location checks, and documentation collection tied into the workflow

---

We focused on what matters in real deployments.

• Signal quality in the screening output, not just whether a conversation happened
• Consistency across recruiters and teams
• Governance including audit trails, rubric versioning, and reviewer artifacts
• Workflow impact including scheduling, rescheduling, no show recovery, and routing
• Integration depth with ATS stages and writeback fields
• Operational fit for SMB versus enterprise environments

If you are evaluating either product, the most important step is a short pilot on real roles with real candidates and hiring managers in the review loop.

---

Classet in one paragraph

Classet is generally positioned as a practical, blue-collar focused hiring automation layer for smaller teams that want to screen and move candidates through early steps without adding headcount. Buyers often look at Classet when the goal is to reduce follow ups, accelerate scheduling, and standardize a lightweight screening motion.

TenzoAI in one paragraph

TenzoAI is built to replace the messy first round phone screen with a repeatable voice interview that produces artifacts hiring teams can actually use. It emphasizes structured evaluation through rubric based scorecards with auditable artifacts, plus workflow automation that keeps the process inside your system of record. TenzoAI also includes additional modules for fraud detection, identity verification, location verification, and documentation collection.

---

Classet best fit

• SMBs that need to improve response rates and time to screen
• Smaller staffing agencies running high volume but simpler workflows
• Teams that want fast deployment and minimal process design
• Programs where audit requirements are light and the primary goal is throughput

Classet may be a weaker fit when

• You need deep ATS writeback across many stages and fields
• You require enterprise grade governance, detailed audit logs, and reviewer packets
• You operate under strict compliance programs that require consistent artifacts for audits
• You need strong SLAs, dedicated support, and structured change management
• You have more than blue-collar roles

TenzoAI best fit

• Enterprises screening high volumes across multiple recruiters and locations
• Large staffing agencies and RPOs that need client ready submission packets
• Compliance sensitive environments that want traceable evaluation artifacts
• High fraud pressure funnels, including hourly roles at scale
• Programs that want a consistent process across multiple business units

TenzoAI may be more than you need when

• You hire at very low volume and recruiters handle every screen live
• You only want a scheduling bot and basic Q and A
• You want a fully self serve tool with little implementation support

---

---

Structured voice screens

• Classet can support early stage screening that helps teams move faster. In many SMB deployments, this is enough because the goal is to reduce recruiter time per candidate.
• TenzoAI is designed around a structured voice interview with a consistent format. It is optimized for repeatability and downstream review.

Rubric based scoring and scorecards

This is often the biggest difference in day to day usage.

• Classet may be sufficient when teams want a lighter screen and a quick next step decision. If you need formal rubrics, validate whether rubric scoring is central to the product or an optional layer.
• TenzoAI leads with rubric based scoring and transparent scorecards. The goal is that every recommendation is legally defensible.

---

Many voice screening tools promise speed, then struggle when procurement or compliance asks how decisions are explained.

Classet and governance expectations

Classet is often used in SMB settings where compliance reviews are lighter and the process is simpler. If you work in a regulated environment, validate what artifacts exist for audits, what logs exist for reviewer access, and how scoring decisions are explained.

TenzoAI and audit readiness

TenzoAI is designed to support fairness review with a de-biasing layer, transparent scorecards, and auditable artifacts. In practice, this typically means structured rubrics, consistent scoring aligned to the role criteria, and reviewable evidence that makes it harder for bias to creep in over time.

What to validate in any voice AI product

Even if a vendor positions itself as enterprise ready, validate these items in a demo.

• Rubric versioning and change history
• Scorecard explainability tied to explicit criteria
• Access controls for transcripts, recordings, and artifacts
• Retention settings, redaction options, and export controls
• Logs for reviewer access and admin changes

A note on common limitations in lighter voice AI tools

In this category, buyers frequently report that some tools can feel robotic at scale, especially when the conversation needs nuance. A second issue is governance. Many lightweight systems are not built to produce audit ready artifacts, or they rely on opaque scoring that is hard to defend. If you are subject to audits or internal fairness review, treat enterprise readiness and compliance as items to prove, not marketing copy to accept.

---

Fraud pressure is no longer rare in high volume hiring. This is one area where product depth can matter.

Classet

Classet is generally evaluated for speed and automation rather than deep screening integrity controls. If fraud is a real problem in your funnel, look to other tools.

TenzoAI

TenzoAI includes multiple controls that can be combined into the early screening step.

• Cheating and fraud detection signals designed to flag suspicious interview behavior
• Identity verification flows that can include having the candidate hold up an ID and checking for authenticity signals
• Location verification for roles with geographic eligibility requirements
• Documentation collection to reduce later back and forth

What matters most is how these flags appear in the recruiter workflow and how you avoid false positives slowing down legitimate candidates.

---

Most teams do not want a new system of record. They want the outcomes inside the ATS.

Integration depth

• Classet is often used with lighter integrations. For SMBs, this can be perfectly acceptable. For enterprises, shallow ATS integration can become a bottleneck because recruiters and managers end up working across multiple tools.
• Tenzo AI is typically implemented as an orchestration layer that maps stages, writeback fields, routing rules, and reviewer access. Deep integration is part of the value proposition, especially for large staffing agencies that need consistent client facing packets.

Scheduling and coordination workflows

Both products can reduce coordinator workload. Tenzo AI is particularly strong when scheduling is complex.

• Complex scheduling patterns, multi site availability, and role families
• Automated reminders and reschedules
• No show recovery and candidate rediscovery
• Rule based routing based on thresholds and outcomes

Candidate rediscovery and internal search

TenzoAI can support candidate rediscovery through phone calls and emails, plus customer AI search across collected artifacts. For staffing and high volume employers, this can turn past screening activity into a reusable asset.

---

Support expectations vary dramatically between SMB tools and enterprise platforms.

Classet support and services expectations

Classet is often deployed in smaller environments where teams prefer speed over a heavy services motion. Some buyers report that support can feel lighter, especially when compared to enterprise vendors that provide dedicated onboarding, structured change management, and formal SLAs. If support is a critical risk factor for you, validate coverage, response times, and whether you get a named owner.

TenzoAI support and rollout model

TenzoAI tends to deliver the most value when implementation is treated as an ops project. Rubric design, ATS mapping, retention policies, and reviewer training are part of the rollout. Large staffing agencies and enterprises often prefer this approach because it reduces variance and improves defensibility.

---

Neither product is best evaluated on sticker price alone. Model ROI against your funnel reality.

Typical ROI drivers for Classet

• Recruiter hours saved from fewer manual follow ups
• Higher completion rates from faster engagement
• Reduced time to schedule and time to first screen
• Better coverage of inbound candidates with the same headcount

Typical ROI drivers for TenzoAI

• Cycle time reduction at scale with more consistent screening
• Fewer manager hours spent on low signal interviews
• Lower risk from better documentation and audit readiness
• Reduced fraud impact through early integrity checks
• Better reuse of candidates through rediscovery and searchable artifacts

Common pricing drivers you should expect to influence both products include monthly volume, number of roles, integration scope, and the level of governance and security requirements.

---

What to validate with Classet

• Depth of ATS integration, including stage mapping and writeback fields
• Reporting depth beyond basic funnel metrics
• Support model, escalation paths, and service levels
• How screening outputs are reviewed by hiring managers, not just recruiters
• Whether the experience becomes robotic when scaled across many roles or locations
• Whether compliance needs can be met if your organization grows

What to validate with TenzoAI

• Setup effort for rubric design and workflow mapping
• How artifacts are retained, redacted, and access controlled
• The full chain from interview to scorecard to ATS writeback
• How fraud and identity flags are handled and how false positives are avoided
• Candidate experience on mobile and completion rates in your market

---

Use this script to run a clean, comparable evaluation.

Suggested demo script

1. Pick one high volume role and one complex role
2. Provide a job description and 10 representative resumes
3. Watch a full flow including outreach, scheduling, and rescheduling
4. Review the output with a hiring manager in the room
5. Confirm what writes back to your ATS and where it appears
6. Trigger edge cases like no shows, opt outs, and accommodation requests
7. Review governance items like retention, redaction, and access controls
8. If relevant, walk through fraud and identity workflows and how flags are triaged

Scorecard for your internal decision

Rate each vendor from 1 to 5 on the items that matter to your environment.

• Signal quality and consistency
• Manager trust in outputs
• Audit readiness and explainability
• Integration depth and operational fit
• Candidate completion and satisfaction
• Support experience and rollout risk
• Total cost relative to ROI

---

Are Classet and TenzoAI direct substitutes

Sometimes they appear on the same shortlist, but they are often chosen for different reasons. Classet tends to map to SMB speed and simplicity. Tenzo AI tends to map to enterprise consistency, governance, and artifacts.

Which product is better for a small staffing agency

Classet is often a more natural fit when you want quick deployment and your workflows are simple. Tenzo AI can still be a fit if you need structured evaluation and client ready artifacts, but you should plan for more implementation work.

Which product is better for enterprises

Tenzo AI is generally the better fit when you need audit readiness, consistent scoring, deep integrations, and governance controls.

Do voice AI tools increase bias risk

They can if the system is a black box. The safest pattern is structured rubrics, transparent scorecards, and auditable artifacts. That is where TenzoAI tends to differentiate.

Will candidates complete voice screens

Completion depends on clarity, length, relevance, and scheduling flexibility. In pilots, measure completion, drop off by step, and average time to complete, then tune the flow before scaling.

---

If you are an SMB or a smaller staffing agency that needs faster engagement and a lighter implementation, Classet is often the pragmatic choice.

If you are an enterprise or a large staffing agency that needs structured voice screening, rubric based scoring, and audit ready artifacts that keep bias controls and compliance front and center, TenzoAI is typically the stronger option.

The right answer is the one that fits your workflow and your governance reality. Run a short pilot with real roles, validate integration depth, and include hiring managers in the review so you can measure trust in the outputs.